On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 23:34, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2023/04/13 11:00, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> > Agreed, it seems to be a leftover when we moved to parse_int_param()
> > in that area.
>
> It looks like there was an oversight in commit e7a2217978. I've attached a patch (0002) that updates PQconnectPoll()
touse parse_int_param() for parsing the keepalives parameter.
>
> As this change is not directly related to the bug fix, it may not be necessary to back-patch it to the stable
versions,I think. Thought?
>
>
> >> To clarify, are you suggesting that PQgetCancel() should
> >> only parse the parameters for TCP connections
> >> if cancel->raddr.addr.ss_family != AF_UNIX?
> >> If so, I think that's a good idea.
> >
> > You're right. I used connip in the diff because I thought it provided
> > the same condition, but in a simpler way.
>
> I made a modification to the 0001 patch. It will now allow PQgetCancel() to parse and interpret TCP connection
parametersonly when the connection is not made through a Unix-domain socket.
>
>
> > However, I notcied that PQgetCancel() doesn't set errbuf.. So, I'm
> > fine with your proposal.
>
> Ok.
>
>
> >> I think it is important to inform the user when an error
> >> occurs and a cancel request cannot be sent, as this information
> >> can help them identify the cause of the problem (such as
> >> setting an overly large value for the keepalives parameter).
> >
> > Although I view it as an internal error, I agree with emitting some
> > error messages in that situation.
>
> Ok.
I have changed the status of the patch to "Waiting on Author" as all
the issues are not addressed. Feel free to address them and change the
status accordingly.
Regards,
Vignesh
