Re: Add option --drop-cascade for pg_dump/restore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Add option --drop-cascade for pg_dump/restore
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm1o4rhjKv2_jQSz+OW4YRUg6RHLN4cf763kH=6DK+xv7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add option --drop-cascade for pg_dump/restore  (Haotian Wu <whtsky@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Add option --drop-cascade for pg_dump/restore
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 12:11 PM Haotian Wu <whtsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree that —drop-cascade does not make sense for pg_dumpall, so I removed them.
>
> > are we expecting more things to appear after the semi-colon?
>
> No, I was just trying to “reuse” original statement as much as possible. Append “\n” manually should also do the job,
andI’ve updated the patch as you suggests. 

1) This change is not required as it is not supported for pg_dumpall
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_dumpall.sgml
@@ -289,6 +289,16 @@ PostgreSQL documentation
       </listitem>
      </varlistentry>

+     <varlistentry>
+      <term><option>--drop-cascade</option></term>
+      <listitem>
+       <para>
+        Use <literal>CASCADE</literal> to drop database objects.
+        This option is not valid unless <option>--clean</option> is
also specified.
+       </para>
+      </listitem>
+     </varlistentry>
+

2) I felt pg_dump will include the cascade option for plain format and
pg_restore will include the cascade option from pg_restore for other
formats. If my understanding is correct, should we document this?

3) This change is not required

destroyPQExpBuffer(ftStmt);
                                                        pg_free(dropStmtOrig);
                                                }
+
                                        }

4) Is it possible to add a few tests for this?

Regards,
Vignesh



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ronan Dunklau
Date:
Subject: Early Sort/Group resjunk column elimination.
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: unnesting multirange data types