Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | vignesh C |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. |
Date | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm15CmSzOfP5dXjwdHPpJuiL6ZkC9VjN5rS_wh48aRLqbQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Adding a '--two-phase' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 at 13:01, Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 12:20 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Shubham. > > > > Here are my review comments for v6-0001. > > > > ====== > > 1. > > +# Verify that the subtwophase is enabled ('e') in the pg_subscription catalog > > +$node_s->poll_query_until('postgres', > > + "SELECT count(1) = 2 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate = 'e';") > > + or die "Timed out while waiting for subscriber to enable twophase"; > > + > > > > This form of the SQL is probably OK but it's a bit tricky; Probably it > > should have been explained in the comment about where that count "2" > > has come from. > > > > ~~ > > > > I think it was OK as before (v5) to be querying until nothing was NOT > > 'e'. In other words, until everything was enabled 'e'. > > SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate NOT IN ('e'); > > > > ~~ > > > > OTOH, to save execution time we really would be satisfied with both > > 'p' and 'e' states here. (we don't strictly need to wait for the > > transition from 'p' to 'e' to occur). > > > > So, SQL like the one below might be the best: > > > > # Verify that all subtwophase states are pending or enabled, > > # e.g. there are no subscriptions where subtwophase is disabled ('d'). > > SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate IN ('d') > > > > I have fixed the given comment. Since prepared transactions are not > being used anymore, I have removed it from the test file. > The attached patch contains the suggested changes. Few comments: 1) Since we are providing --enable-two-phase option now and user can create subscriptions with two-phase option this warning can be removed now: <para> - <application>pg_createsubscriber</application> sets up logical - replication with two-phase commit disabled. This means that any - prepared transactions will be replicated at the time - of <command>COMMIT PREPARED</command>, without advance preparation. - Once setup is complete, you can manually drop and re-create the - subscription(s) with + If <option>--enable-two-phase</option> is not specified, the + <application>pg_createsubscriber</application> sets up logical replication + with two-phase commit disabled. This means that any prepared transactions + will be replicated at the time of <command>COMMIT PREPARED</command>, + without advance preparation. Once setup is complete, you can manually drop + and re-create the subscription(s) with the <link linkend="sql-createsubscription-params-with-two-phase"><literal>two_phase</literal></link> - option enabled. 2) Since we are not going to wait till the subscriptions are enabled, we can use safe_psql instead of poll_query_until, something like: is($node_s->safe_psql('postgres', "SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate = 'd'"), 't', 'subscriptions are created with the two-phase option enabled'); instead of: +$node_s->poll_query_until('postgres', + "SELECT count(1) = 0 FROM pg_subscription WHERE subtwophasestate IN ('d');" +); 3) This can be removed from the commit message: Documentation has been updated to reflect the new option, and test cases have been added to validate various scenarios, including proper validation of the '--enable-two-phase' option and its combinations with other options. 4) Should" two-phase option" be "enable-two-phase option" here: const char *sub_username; /* subscriber username */ + bool two_phase; /* two-phase option */ SimpleStringList database_names; /* list of database names */ Regards, Vignesh
pgsql-hackers by date: