On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 2:41 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-May-04, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 5:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > 1. Commit message
> > >
> > > In another thread using the terminology "multi-master" seems to be
> > > causing some problems. Maybe you should choose different wording in
> > > this commit message to avoid having the same problems?
> >
> > I felt, we can leave this to committer
>
> Please don't. See
> https://postgr.es/m/20200615182235.x7lch5n6kcjq4aue@alap3.anarazel.de
In this thread changing multimaster to multi-source did not get agreed
and the changes did not get committed. The code still uses multimaster
as in [1]. I think we should keep it as "multimaster" as that is
already being used in [1].
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/different-replication-solutions.html
Regards,
Vignesh
