Re: dropdb --force - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: dropdb --force
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm0RZ3JiTg2p+LQUXKD-neaVu+=WmqyfGCUwmrmDdJEjgg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dropdb --force  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: dropdb --force
Re: dropdb --force
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:10 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> čt 21. 11. 2019 v 6:33 odesílatel vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> napsal:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:30 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'll send this test today
>> >
>> >
>> > here is it
>> >
>>
>> Thanks for adding the test.
>> Few comments:
>> This function is same as in test/recovery/t/013_crash_restart.pl, we
>> can add to a common file and use in both places:
>> +# Pump until string is matched, or timeout occurs
>> +sub pump_until
>> +{
>> +    my ($proc, $stream, $untl) = @_;
>> +    $proc->pump_nb();
>> +    while (1)
>> +    {
>> +        last if $$stream =~ /$untl/;
>> +        if ($psql_timeout->is_expired)
>> +        {
>
>
> yes, I know - probably it can be moved to testlib.pm. Unfortunately it is perl, and I am not able to this correctly.
Moreit use global object - timer 
>
>> This can be Tests drop database with force option:
>
>
> done
>
>> +#
>> +# Tests killing session connected to dropped database
>> +#
>>
>> This can be changed to check database foobar1 does not exist.
>
>
> done
>
>> +# and there is not a database with this name
>> +is($node->safe_psql('postgres', qq[SELECT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM
>> pg_database WHERE datname='foobar1');]),
>> +    'f', 'database foobar1 was removed');
>>
>> This can be changed to check the connections on foobar1 database
>> +
>> +# and it is connected to foobar1 database
>> +is($node->safe_psql('postgres', qq[SELECT pid FROM pg_stat_activity
>> WHERE datname='foobar1' AND pid = $pid;]),
>> +    $pid, 'database foobar1 is used');
>
>
> done
>
>>
>> This can be changed to restart psql as the previous connection will be
>> terminated by previous drop database.
>> +
>
>
> done
>
> new patch attached
>

Thanks for fixing the comments. The changes looks fine to me. I have
fixed the first comment, attached patch has the changes for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: Why overhead of SPI is so large?
Next
From: Rushabh Lathia
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests