On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 06:52, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 19:26, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 12:23, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Note: actually, this would be OK if we are able to keep the OIDs of
> > > the subscribers consistent across upgrades? I'm OK to not do nothing
> > > about that in this patch, to keep it simpler. Just asking in passing.
> >
> > I will analyze more on this and post the analysis in the subsequent mail.
>
> I analyzed further and felt that retaining subscription oid would be
> cleaner as subscription/subscription_rel/replication_origin/replication_origin_status
> all of these will be using the same oid as earlier and also probably
> help in supporting upgrade of subscription in more scenarios later.
> Here is a patch to handle the same.
Sorry I had attached the older patch, here is the correct updated one.
Regards,
Vignesh
