Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes
Date
Msg-id CAL9smLB14E8AmA4ZuDzkFun+_BFEwH+fvGfO8op4Hfxij0_K7A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 08:00:28AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Oh, so non-correlated subqueries can be run in parallel.  Yes, that is
> > something we should have in the release notes.  How is this?
> >
> >         Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
> >         2017-02-14 [5e6d8d2bb] Allow parallel workers to execute subplans.
> >
> >         Allow non-correlated subqueries to be run in parallel (Amit Kapila)
> >
>
> Looks good to me.

It's not clear from this item what the previous behavior was.  How about adding something like "Correlated subqueries can not yet be parallelized."?  (I'm guessing that's the change, anyway, please correct me if I'm mistaken.)


.m

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort
Next
From: ilmari@ilmari.org (Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG 10 release notes