Re: BUG #15489: Segfault on DELETE - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Frederico Galvão
Subject Re: BUG #15489: Segfault on DELETE
Date
Msg-id CAL02vUAtQ81AhQttcj5mXSR0HvbimCAMi4dWPja9fvNAUK7xyg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #15489: Segfault on DELETE  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-bugs
I'm happy I could help, and I'm even happier to see you guys were 10 steps ahead of me and already fixed it for 11.1, which I'm definitely looking forward to.

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 11:33 PM Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
Thanks Frederico for your reply.

On 2018/11/08 10:10, Frederico Costa Galvão wrote:
> I stumbled upon this issue yesterday, and trying to reduce and pinpoint
> it, I managed to get to this:
>
> //start
> CREATE TABLE a (
>     id bigint
> );
>
> INSERT INTO a (id) VALUES (1); -- this id's value doesn't matter
>
> ALTER TABLE ONLY a
>     ADD CONSTRAINT a_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id);
>
> CREATE TABLE b (
>     a_id bigint
> );
>
> ALTER TABLE ONLY b
>     ADD CONSTRAINT b_a_id_fkey FOREIGN KEY (a_id) REFERENCES a(id);
>
> ALTER TABLE a ADD x BOOLEAN NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE; -- or TRUE, doesn't
> matter

There it is.  These are similar steps as I'd used to track down a bug
that's now fixed in 11.1.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9cb4aa1c-12ba-59c3-fd75-545fa90fb92f%40lab.ntt.co.jp

The bug had to do with foreign key trigger not getting a proper
representation of the tuple being deleted, considering the newly added column.

> -- VACUUM FULL ANALYZE a; -- uncomment this to fix the bug

Ah, VACUUM FULL will rewrite the tuples such that they're not hit by the
aforementioned bug.

So, if OP can tell that this is what happened in their case too, then 11.1
will have fixed the issue.

Thanks,
Amit



--
Frederico Costa Galvão
Engenheiro de Computação - Universidade Federal de Goiás
PontoGet Inovação Web
Tippz Mobile

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: PG Bug reporting form
Date:
Subject: BUG #15492: pg_cancel_backend(pg_backend_pid()) returns truesporadically
Next
From: Tillmann Schulz
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15448: server process (PID 22656) was terminated byexception 0xC0000005