Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Yang Zhang
Subject Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select
Date
Msg-id CAKxBDU-QW1mKbg36xi3ghXT23yJ-AqZ9=KgxhX=ZbRo4M5eAFw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select
List pgsql-general
It's actually just `text`.

I updated my SO question with some more info including explain analyze
(no difference), \d,
and your last incantation.

Thanks!

On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yang Zhang <yanghatespam@gmail.com> writes:
>>     db=> explain select * from lead where email = 'blah';
>>                              QUERY PLAN
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------
>>      Seq Scan on lead  (cost=0.00..319599.38 rows=1 width=5108)
>>        Filter: (email = 'blah'::text)
>>     (2 rows)
>
> That's awfully odd.  What data type is the "email" column?
>
> It seems possible also that the index on it is marked invalid.  I'd have
> expected \d to tell you so, but maybe you're using a version of psql that
> doesn't know about that.  It'd be interesting to look at
> select * from pg_index where indexrelid = 'index name here'::regclass;
>
>
>                         regards, tom lane



--
Yang Zhang
http://yz.mit.edu/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is PostgreSQL 9.1 not using index for simple equality select