Re: Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Travers
Subject Re: Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server
Date
Msg-id CAKt_Zfu3_KL2T-hEFJEnJwzeijBpSjK6zF-HyeNPsMpxZ9Uxnw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows SIngle Sign On - LINUX Server  (Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz>)
List pgsql-general


On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Palmer <JPalmer@linz.govt.nz> wrote:
Marcus' guide looks great.

So what's the pros/cons of using the Kerberos via GSSAPI method, rather than going for the SingleSignOn method mentioned by Sunday?

Cons:

More complicated to set up.

There are a few odd things about AD and Kerberos that take some getting used to.  For example iirc, systems get keys rather than services, so your keytab ends up showing identical keys for every service on a machine 

Pros:

Far more secure

True single-sign-on (users do not have to enter passwords). 

Unlike LDAP does not require degrading DC security.

I would honestly go with GSSAPI.

It's not quite the same thing but a paper I wrote (published by Microsoft!) is likely to be helpful here:


The paper discusses using kerberized authentication for OpenSSH against AD.  In principle, PostgreSQL should be relatively similar.  The paper may be of help here.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jukka Inkeri
Date:
Subject: Permission denied for relation pg_database , one role has problem
Next
From: Edson Richter
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql 9.1 on VMWare ESXi 5.0