Re: Code of Conduct - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Travers
Subject Re: Code of Conduct
Date
Msg-id CAKt_Zftg8tLVO5=NkxTP4qdW0fonpY0wWG8DrTuKzn4hXr08tw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Code of Conduct  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general


On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:35 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> I would ask that you, and anyone else who has a suggestion for how to
> improve or revise the CoC, submit your ideas to the committee by
> email'ing coc@postgresql.org.
> As was discussed previously, the current CoC isn't written in stone and
> it will be changed and amended as needed.

The change process is spelled out explicitly in the CoC document.

I believe though that the current plan is to wait awhile (circa 1 year)
and get some experience with the current version before considering
changes.

My $0.02:

If you are going to have a comment period, have a comment period and actually deliberate over changes.

If you are going to just gather feedback and wait a year, use some sort of issue system.

Otherwise, there is no reason to think that feedback gathered now will have any impact at all in the next revision. 

                        regards, tom lane


--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito:  Hosted Accounting and ERP.  Robust and Flexible.  No vendor lock-in.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: marcelo
Date:
Subject: Re: Select into table%ROWTYPE failed
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] optimising the pl/pgsql function