Re: eval function - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Travers
Subject Re: eval function
Date
Msg-id CAKt_ZftLhvermaOTHykzdZmdx+22KFsTJxUVehY7i4-KQmbftQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: eval function  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: eval function  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This function is an absolute no-go if the string literal is coming
> from untrusted source, and any robust defenses would ruin the intended
> effect of the function.  There are a number of nasty ways you can (at
> minimum) DOS your database by allowing arbitrary sql.  For example,
> using generate_series() and advisory_locks you can exhaust lock space.
>

This is specifically why I would feel extremely uncomfortable exposing
the string literals as function arguments.  I don't think you can
generally trust the inputs of general-purpose stored procs.

The thing is if stored proc that might call this is in pl/pgsql, all
you need to do is:

EXECUTE expr INTO myvar;

Or in this case:

DECLARE t_enddate;
                t_expr;

BEGIN
SELECT last_date INTO t_expr FROM date_ranges;
EXECUTE $E$ SELECT ('$E$ || t_expr || $E$') $E$ INTO t_enddate;
END;

That's four lines of code extra needed.  In PL/Perl or PL/Python, I
think you'd have to create a query and run it. but you could do this
with a module that wouldn't create a stored proc capable of taking
this as the argument.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Chris Travers
Date:
Subject: Re: eval function
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: eval function