Re: suggestion about time based partitioning and hibernate - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Luca Ferrari
Subject Re: suggestion about time based partitioning and hibernate
Date
Msg-id CAKoxK+6oppv0xR0cwmuOxeepqeogydKgKT2RiPZJvS0rOV9-7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: suggestion about time based partitioning and hibernate  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: suggestion about time based partitioning and hibernate  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 6:45 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> Therefore I suggest to avoid doing
> that.  Either look at some other partitioning scheme that doesn't
> involve adding columns to the primary key, or disregard partitioning for
> this table entirely.

What do you mean by "other partitioning scheme"? There is nothing that
comes into my mind at the moment.
The problem is that, unluckily, the table is already greater than 50GB
in seize and is keep growing, so I guess something has to be done, at
least for a manainance point of view.

Would a partition by hash on the single column primary key be such a bad idea?

Thanks,
Luca



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: My 1st JDBC and PostgreSQL
Next
From: Anthony Apollis
Date:
Subject: Re: TSQL To Postgres - Unpivot/Union All