Re: Trouble using pg_rewind to undo standby promotion - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Torsten Förtsch |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Trouble using pg_rewind to undo standby promotion |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAKkG4_kt9zZNPwB2Qd0-jAtRn3m=JPWW_-hc8VSyhfZ+VjfKQw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Trouble using pg_rewind to undo standby promotion (Craig McIlwee <craigm@vt.edu>) |
Responses |
Re: Trouble using pg_rewind to undo standby promotion
|
List | pgsql-general |
Your point of divergence is in the middle of the 7718/000000BF file. So, you should have 2 such files eventually, one on timeline 1 and the other on timeline 2.
Are you archiving WAL on the promoted machine in a way that your restore_command can find it? Check archive_command and archive_mode on the promoted machine.
Also, do your archive/restore scripts work properly for history files?
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 7:48 PM Craig McIlwee <craigm@vt.edu> wrote:
I have a primary -> standby 1 -> standby 2 setup with all servers running PG 13.8 (this effort is part of getting on to a newer version, but I think those details aren't relevant to this problem). The first standby uses streaming replication from the primary and the second standby is using a WAL archive with a restore_command. To make this standby chain work, standby 1 is set to archive_mode = always with a command that populates the WAL archive.I would like to be able to promote standby 2 (hereon referred to just as 'standby'), perform some writes, then rewind it back to the point before promotion so it can become a standby again. The documentation for pg_rewind says that this is supported and it seems like it should be straightforward, but I'm not having any luck getting this to work so I'm hoping someone can point out what I'm doing wrong. Here's what I did:First, observe that WAL is properly being applied from the archive. Note that we are currently on timeline 1.
2024-11-06 09:51:23.286 EST [5438] LOG: restored log file "0000000100007711000000F9" from archive
2024-11-06 09:51:23.434 EST [5438] LOG: restored log file "0000000100007711000000FA" from archive
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/0000000100007711000000FB.gz: No such file or directory
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/00000002.history.gz: No such file or directoryNext, stop postgres, set wal_log_hints = on as required by pg_rewind, and restart postgres. I also make a copy of the data directory while the postgres is not running so I can repeat my test, which works fine on a small test database but won't be possible for the multi TB database that I will eventually be doing this on.Now promote the standby using "select pg_promote()" and see that it switches to a new timeline. You can also see that the last WAL applied from the archive is 7718/BF.2024-11-06 12:10:10.831 EST [4336] LOG: restored log file "0000000100007718000000BD" from archive
2024-11-06 12:10:10.996 EST [4336] LOG: restored log file "0000000100007718000000BE" from archive
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/0000000100007718000000BF.gz: No such file or directory
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/00000002.history.gz: No such file or directory
2024-11-06 12:10:15.384 EST [4336] LOG: restored log file "0000000100007718000000BF" from archive
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/0000000100007718000000C0.gz: No such file or directory
2024-11-06 12:10:15.457 EST [4336] LOG: received promote request
2024-11-06 12:10:15.457 EST [4336] LOG: redo done at 7718/BFFFFF30
2024-11-06 12:10:15.457 EST [4336] LOG: last completed transaction was at log time 2024-11-06 12:10:22.627074-05
2024-11-06 12:10:15.593 EST [4336] LOG: restored log file "0000000100007718000000BF" from archive
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/00000002.history.gz: No such file or directory
2024-11-06 12:10:15.611 EST [4336] LOG: selected new timeline ID: 2
2024-11-06 12:10:15.640 EST [4336] LOG: archive recovery complete
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/00000001.history.gz: No such file or directory
2024-11-06 12:10:17.028 EST [4329] LOG: database system is ready to accept connectionsNext, insert a record into just to make some changes that I want to rollback later. (What I will eventually be doing is creating a publication to ship data to a newer version, but again, that's not what's important here.)Finally, shutdown postgres and attempt a rewind. The address used in the --source-server connection string is the address of the primary.2024-11-06 12:11:11.139 EST [4329] LOG: received fast shutdown request
2024-11-06 12:11:11.143 EST [4329] LOG: aborting any active transactions
2024-11-06 12:11:11.144 EST [4329] LOG: background worker "logical replication launcher" (PID 5923) exited with exit code 1
2024-11-06 12:11:40.933 EST [4342] LOG: shutting down
2024-11-06 12:11:41.753 EST [4329] LOG: database system is shut down/usr/pgsql-13/bin/pg_rewind --target-pgdata=/data/pgsql/operational --source-server="host=x.x.x.x dbname=postgres user=xxx password=xxx" --dry-run --progress --restore-target-walpg_rewind: connected to server
pg_rewind: servers diverged at WAL location 7718/BFFFFFE8 on timeline 1
/data/wal_archive/restore_operational.sh: line 2: /data/wal_archive/operational/0000000200007718000000BF.gz: No such file or directory
pg_rewind: error: could not restore file "0000000200007718000000BF" from archive
pg_rewind: fatal: could not find previous WAL record at 7718/BFFFFFE8pg_rewind shows the point of divergence as 7718/BF on timeline 1, but when it tries to replay WAL using the restore command it is trying to find WAL from timeline 2 rather than picking back up on timeline 1. I tried setting recovery_target_timeline on the target database to 'current' and '1' but that gave the same result. Searching the archives, [1] mentions the need to force a checkpoint after promotion which I tried even though the problem description isn't the same. [2] mentions a problem that looks more like the one I am facing but has no responses. At this point I don't know what to do next and hope someone can point me in the right direction.[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e7b16ddea93a92575cb6d143b6ef602cab22432e.camel%40cybertec.atCraig
pgsql-general by date: