On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 at 21:39, Álvaro Herrera <
alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Apr-04, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> > Non text modes for pg_dumpall, correspondingly change pg_restore
>
> I think the new oid_string_list stuff in this commit is unnecessary, and
> we can remove a bunch of lines by simplifying that to using
> SimplePtrList, as the attached illustrates. (Perhaps the names of
> members of the proposed struct can be improved.)
Thanks Álvaro for the patch.
I took this patch and did some testing. Patch looks good to me. I was not able to use "git am" in my setup due to CR's in patch but no warning in the patch when I used "patch -p".
One review comment:
We are using FLEXIBLE_ARRAY_MEMBER for dbname. Can we use NAMEDATALEN? In code, many places we are using this hard coded value of 64 size for names.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 01:44, Andrew Dunstan <
andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 2025-04-14 Mo 12:28 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> I'm also not sure about the double sscanf() business there ... There
> >> must be a better way to do this.
> >
> >
> >
> > Yes, probably. I'll look into that if you like.
> >
> >
> >
>
> something like this?
Your patch looks good to me. I took your patch and did 1-2 line adjustments as per below. Please have a look.
--- a/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
+++ b/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
@@ -1053,15 +1053,19 @@ get_dbname_oid_list_from_mfile(const char *dumpdirpath, SimpleOidStringList *dbn
while ((fgets(line, MAXPGPATH, pfile)) != NULL)
{
Oid db_oid = InvalidOid;
- char db_oid_str[MAXPGPATH + 1] = "";
char *dbname;
+ char *p = line;
/* Extract dboid. */
sscanf(line, "%u", &db_oid);
- sscanf(line, "%20s", db_oid_str);
+
+ while(isdigit(*p))
+ p++;
+
+ Assert(*p == ' ');
/* dbname is the rest of the line */
- dbname = line + strlen(db_oid_str) + 1;
+ dbname = ++p;
/* Remove \n from dbname. */
dbname[strlen(dbname) - 1] = '\0';
--
Thanks and Regards
Mahendra Singh Thalor
EnterpriseDB:
http://www.enterprisedb.com