Re: [GENERAL] - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jaime Soler
Subject Re: [GENERAL]
Date
Msg-id CAKVUGgR-8CeLyxSAddKX45ypE9-kzhb2xfAiVo-AV5qTkCyK5Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL]  (Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
well if you would like to cancel o terminate a session before start inserting or updating data , you can use pg_cancel_backend or pg_terminate_backend using pid returning from select pid pg_stat_activity where state='active' ..

2016-12-21 13:28 GMT+01:00 Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95@gmail.com>:
Dear All, 

I understood below point and i will do the same on my system.

Can i close db session before REINDEX operation and again start db session after REINDEX completed?


Regards,
Yogesh

On Wednesday, December 21, 2016, Jaime Soler <jaime.soler@gmail.com> wrote:
if you want to reduce the impact of reindex in your inserts and updates operations why don't you try drop index and  CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
As Alban said you I don't recommend you to execute reindex every hour, at least try to reduce the scope of the reindex to the minimal object.





2016-12-21 12:51 GMT+01:00 Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95@gmail.com>:
Dear Alban,

In my production system, there are lot of read write operation performed every hour. 
So, i am thinking, if i can add check during REINDEX operation nothing update and insert operation performed.
Is it possible?

Regards,
Yogesh

On Wednesday, December 21, 2016, Alban Hertroys <haramrae@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21 December 2016 at 09:59, Yogesh Sharma <yogeshraj95@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, every hour,i am performing VACUUM and REINDEX operation on table.

Why are you running REINDEX every hour? That's a very unusual thing to
do, you'd need a pretty good reason for that.

--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
Cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] error updating a tuple after promoting a standby
Next
From: Tom DalPozzo
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] error updating a tuple after promoting a standby