Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To handle long numbers for Rows (estimated) field in Table's properties - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Murtuza Zabuawala
Subject Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To handle long numbers for Rows (estimated) field in Table's properties
Date
Msg-id CAKKotZT31bxDujYHpYm3Hst25iPpU4mjv-TExGRkwG7wQV4d7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To handle long numbers for Rows (estimated)field in Table's properties  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: [pgAdmin4][Patch]: To handle long numbers for Rows (estimated)field in Table's properties
List pgadmin-hackers
Hi Dave,

Please find updated patch with suggested changes.


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
In my opinion, displaying 2000+ instead of actual value doesn't looks good.

Let say my threshold is set to 5000 and I have 1million rows, displaying 5000+ instead of actual value doesn't looks good.
OR
What we can do is, we can hide the field if it is empty/or less than threshold.

I don't think it would necessarily look bad - after all, the estimated row count will be displayed right above it.
 

Thoughts?


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Harshal Dhumal <harshal.dhumal@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi Murtuza,

I think for tables having row count more than preference count it should show preference count with plus '+' sign instead empty.
eg. 2000+ (for table with rows more than 2000 and for preference count of 2000.)

That's a nice idea.
 


Inline image 1

 

-- 
Harshal Dhumal
Sr. Software Engineer

EnterpriseDB India: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi Dave,

Please find updated patch.

​-- Murtuza​


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Thanks Dave, I'll check the implementation in pgAdmin3 & send new patch with suggested changes.


On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Hi

On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Hi,

PFA patch to fix the issue where "Rows (estimated)" field was not displaying long number properly.
RM#2386

I have also added the code to count actual rows in a table [ "Rows (counted)" filed ] which was missing.

Oops. Well the idea is good, but unfortunately we want to be careful about when we count the rows, as we could have just clicked on a 10B row table which would take a while. To avoid that, pgAdmin III would only count the rows in the table if the estimated number of rows was below a specific value (see File -> Preferences -> Browser -> Properties -> "Count rows if estimated less than").

I think we need to do the same here - add a preferences option, and only count if estimated is greater than the specified value (the default for which was 2000 in pgAdmin III I believe).

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company




--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixes for pgAdmin4 messages
Next
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: pgAdmin 4: Russian translation