Re: [pgadmin-hackers][Patch] Refactor sql template version picking - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Murtuza Zabuawala
Subject Re: [pgadmin-hackers][Patch] Refactor sql template version picking
Date
Msg-id CAKKotZQQKc=VaXCS7kn-92t9DQX4bABHG7Fx9b83i=gbek_WOA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgadmin-hackers][Patch] Refactor sql template version picking  (Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [pgadmin-hackers][Patch] Refactor sql template version picking  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Hi Dave,

I found one typo as given below and apart from that, code is working as expected with new template loader,

  • web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/__init__.py:241:        return 'ppas/#{0#}'.format(ver)

--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Murtuza Zabuawala <murtuza.zabuawala@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
Sure Dave, I will take a look.

--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Scrub that Khushboo - Murtuza, can you review on Monday please? I'm
being told Khushboo is on the critical path for something else at the
moment.

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Very nice indeed! I didn't realise we'd ended up with quite so many
> duplicated templates.
>
> Both patches look good to me - really the only thing that caught my
> eye was the name versioned_template_loader which is somewhat longer
> than I'd prefer.
>
> As it's a major change, and we're going to be wrapping 1.2 in a little
> over a week, I'd like some further review before committing. Khushboo,
> can you take a look first thing on Monday please? If you're happy,
> I'll commit and ask Fahar to do some testing.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:48 PM, George Gelashvili
> <ggelashvili@pivotal.io> wrote:
>> As a followup, we created this additional patch removing now-redundant sql
>> templates. If you're interested in how we decided what files to delete, the
>> script we used is here. We only removed files that were exactly identical
>> between multiple postgres versions for the same feature.
>>
>> This patch should be applied on a master patched with
>> version-aware-sql-template-loader-refactor.diff
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:22 PM, George Gelashvili <ggelashvili@pivotal.io>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hackers!
>>>
>>> Since we are preparing to add greenplum support, we made a new template
>>> loader to automatically pick the available sql template file that
>>> corresponds to the postgres version number.
>>>
>>> Our next patch will be to remove duplicated sql template files since many
>>> of the files are identical between versions.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> George & Tira
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Murtuza Zabuawala
Date:
Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To fix the issue in handling of timestamp type
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4] [PATCH] Simplify Server's python setup