On 17 May 2018 at 13:17, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Or maybe, change the comment to say that even the negative indexes are
> 0-based like you pointed out, *but* instead of updating the comment like
> you suggest above, change the other index value assignment statement to
> not subtract 1 from the list_length by switching order with the
> accompanying lappend; like this:
>
> if (get_rel_relkind(partrelid) != RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
> {
> + pd->indexes[i] = list_length(*leaf_part_oids);
> *leaf_part_oids = lappend_oid(*leaf_part_oids, partrelid);
> - pd->indexes[i] = list_length(*leaf_part_oids) - 1;
> }
> else
> {
That makes sense. It's probably less confusing that way.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
