On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 09:31, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> After having written this code, I'm still torn about whether to go
> further with this design. On the one hand, this is such boilerplate
> code that it's kinda hard to imagine it having too many more bugs; on
> the other hand, as you can see, it's a non-trivial amount of code to
> add without a real clear reason, and I'm not sure we have one, even
> though in the abstract it seems like a better way to go.
I think we do need to ensure that the PartitionDesc matches between
worker and leader. Have a look at choose_next_subplan_for_worker() in
nodeAppend.c. Notice that a call is made to
ExecFindMatchingSubPlans().
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
