Re: NOT IN subquery optimization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f9VqhSq3KRaz8Npsj-xFgSw8FAf=O8knCaSuJKgosknHQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOT IN subquery optimization  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 03:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> writes:
> > I'm not sure if I have an issue with competing patches on the same
> > thread.  I've seen that before and it can lead to a good outcome.  It
> > case, as you say, also lead to confusion.
>
> It's a bit of a shame that the cfbot will only be testing one of them
> at a time if we leave it like this.  I kind of lean towards the
> two-thread, two-CF-entry approach because of that.  The amount of
> confusion is a constant.

That sounds fine. I'll take mine elsewhere since I didn't start this thread.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: using index or check in ALTER TABLE SET NOT NULL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info