Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f92THmtoU5Mm+_ZFzgOqrQVaAwECsc9nrX1J_RRGr6xKA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 16 November 2017 at 15:54, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Anyway I added __attribute((noinline)) to the two
> functions and got the following result.
>
>> bms_add_range in 1.24 (12.4 ns per loop)
>> bms_add_range2 in 0.8 (8 ns per loop)

I see similar here with __attribute((noinline)). Thanks for
investigating that. Your way is clearly better. Thanks for suggesting
it.

-- David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Treating work_mem as a shared resource (Was: Parallel Hash take II)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Assertion failure when the non-exclusive pg_stop_backup aborted.