Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8n-74Sxk9SKx2B3udstjHNo2H-Mgu1ngx3X238i_4Ciw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks for looking at this. I've taken most of your suggestions, some
I had changed around as a result of Amit's review.

On 7 May 2018 at 15:34, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> +       During actual execution of the query plan.  Partition pruning may also
> Remove "actual" ?

I left this out one. I imagined it would be common to think of
executor startup/execution/execution shutdown as "query execution",
but I really only mean during the middle of those three things.  If
you can think of a better way to make that more clear, then it might
be worth considering. For now, I think removing "actual" won't help.

A patch will follow shortly, in response to Amit's review.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: Draft release notes are up
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?