Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f8AuJvM49KnnCMbvN5nCD0fwEa6pyKJysB7QLnKfun=sQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath
List pgsql-hackers
On 19 February 2018 at 18:01, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 19 February 2018 at 15:11, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> and perhaps we should do s/isproxy/is_proxy/ which seems like the usual
>> naming for boolean variables.
>
> You're right. I'll change that and post an updated patch. I'll also
> reprocess your email again and try to improve some comments to make
> the intent of the code more clear.

I've made a few changes to the patch. "isproxy" is now "is_proxy".
I've made the comments a bit more verbose at the top of the definition
of struct AppendPath. Also shuffled some comments around in allpaths.c

I've attached both a delta patch with just these changes, and also a
completely new patch based on a recent master.

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - allow to specify scale as a size
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning