Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f84sNmcPVpoScvdYz8HcCHOpnOh8KTKsYvYGHUqJp0mSw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian  (Phil Florent <philflorent@hotmail.com>)
Responses RE: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian  (Phil Florent <philflorent@hotmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16 July 2018 at 16:56, Phil Florent <philflorent@hotmail.com> wrote:

I should post that in the general section but I am confused by the sentence "A parent partition is always going to have a lower relid than its children"


It's a little confusing since RelOptInfo has a relid field and so does RangeTblEntry. They both have completely different meanings.  RelOptInfo's relid is a number starting at 1 and continues in a gapless sequence increasing by 1 with each RelOptInfo.  These relids are completely internal to the server and don't appear in the system catalog tables.  RangeTblEntry's relid is what's in pg_class.oid.

I was talking about RelOptInfo's relid.

Using relids starting at 1 is quite convenient for allowing direct array lookups in various data structures in the planner. However it's also required to uniquely identify a relation as a single table may appear many times in a query, so trying to identify them by their oid could be ambiguous.  Also, some RTEKinds don't have storage, e.g a VALUES() clause.

--
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Florent
Date:
Subject: RE: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian
Next
From: Amit Khandekar
Date:
Subject: Re: AtEOXact_ApplyLauncher() and subtransactions