On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 13:04, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:33:54PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > Correct. The idea was to maintain readability while making the regex a bit
> > better, without any claims to make it perfect.
>
> Agreed with your position. I see no point is making all the
> expressions unreadable for little gain. What Daniel proposed upthread
> had a better balance in my opinion than the previous behavior, without
> sacrifying the readability of anything and still improving the error
> detection.
FWIW, this was the first time I'd really worked with TAP tests. I had
been looking into it because I needed to add a new test.
I was surprised to see it working this way and not just doing a diff
with some known good output. I'm maybe just missing the reason that's
not possible, but to me, it seems a bit less error-prone than trying
to ensure an exact match with a bunch of regular expressions.
--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
