On Tuesday, February 28, 2023, Tom Lane <
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> It is unclear to me whether you were instead talking about other sessions
> dropping tables as another way of saying "ACCESS EXCLUSIVE" in which case
> at what lock level should this anomaly go away, and does it?
The originally-proposed tests seemed to all involve either TRUNCATE
or DROP TABLE,
The only purpose of those was to produce a self-contained script that could be run repeatedly. The commands were outside the transaction flow demonstrating the issue.
David J.
