On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:47 PM, David G. Johnston <
david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
> On this node's detail (the rows seems to appear consistently regardless o=
f
> node ordering in the plan...)
> Hash (cost=3D1440572.59..1440572.59 rows=3D872393 width=3D24) (actual
> time=3D151981.919..151981.919 rows=3D*1275138* loops=3D1)
>
> Bad Plan: =E2=80=8B
>
> =E2=80=8B =E2=80=8B
> Buckets: 131072 (originally 131072) Batches: 32 (originally 16) Memory
> Usage: 3073kB
>
Final result: =E2=80=8B415,967 / =E2=80=8B416,075 (108 missing)
> =E2=80=8BBad Plan: =E2=80=8B Buckets: 65536 (originally 65536) Batches=
: 32 (originally
> 16) Memory Usage: 3585kB
>
=E2=80=8BFinal result: 415,874 / 416,075 (201 missing)=E2=80=8B
=E2=80=8BDavid J.=E2=80=8B
