Would it be OK to name the (planned) release date of the final minor release in that table?
I'm asking because I've had some complaints from people who assume, I believe reasonably, that that table represents the actual EOL and not the current meaning of, "the date past which the date of the next point release is planned to come out."
I am not getting that. If you look at 10:
Version Current minor Supported First release date EOL date 10 10.5 Yes October 2017 October 2022
EOL of life is at the 5 years support stated. At that point no further releases will be done on it.
9.3:
September 2018
Minor Releases:
November 8th, 2018
February 14th, 2019
May 9th, 2019
August 8th, 2019
The point is that 9.3 supposedly goes out of support in November 2018 but the EOL Month is September, two months earlier. If it truly ended in September the August release we just made would be the final one. But now that its September the next one is final but won't happen for 2 months.
