Re: Error-safe user functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Error-safe user functions
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwb8G1NYsTnWxQmsy0FJiXoi+k41YeNEfCL9o3DH30MSBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Error-safe user functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Error-safe user functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 9:59 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:

> Are you suggesting we should not go down the path that v8-0003 does in the
> monitoring section cleanup thread?  I find the usability of Chapter 54
> System Views to be superior to these two run-on chapters and would rather
> we emulate it in both these places - for what is in the end very little
> additional effort, all mechanical in nature.

I have not been following that thread, and am not really excited about
putting in a huge amount of documentation work here.  I'd just like 9.26
to have a mini-TOC at the page head, which <sect2>'s would be enough for.


So long as you aren't opposed to the idea if someone else does the work, adding sect2 is better than nothing even if it is just a stop-gap measure.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Error-safe user functions
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_dump: lock tables in batches