"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes: > I am a bit torn between "\dcp" (or \dsetting / \dconfig? we don't > necessarily need for it to be super short) and "\sc". Certainly with > pattern matching the interface for the "\d" commands would fit that > pattern. "\sc" would make sense for a thorough introspection of what is > in the GUC. That said, we get that with SHOW today.
> So I'm leaning towards something in the "\d" family.
I agree that \d-something makes the most sense from a functionality standpoint. But I don't want to make the name too long, even if we do have tab completion to help.
\dconf maybe?
I don't have a strong preference, but just tossing it out there; maybe embrace the novelty of GUC?
