Pavel Luzanov <p.luzanov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > What if this long output will be available only for \du+, and for \du > just show distinct (without duplicates) > roles in the current array format? For those, who don't care about these > new membership options, nothing will change. > Those, who need details will use the + modifier. > ?
I kind of like that. Would we change to newlines in the Attributes field in both \du and \du+? (I'm +1 for that, but maybe others aren't.)
If we don't change the \du "Member of" column display (aside from removing duplicates) I'm disinclined to change the Attributes column.
I too am partial to only exposing this detail on the extended (+) display.
