"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Monday, June 3, 2024, Alejandro Burne <adburne@gmail.com> wrote: >> A local variable, created within a transaction, continues to persist >> (without value) after the transaction has ended.
> This is under-documented but at present there is no plan to change this > long-standing behavior, just document it better.
Keep in mind that this entire behavior (ie the ability to create GUCs not declared in the C code) is an undocumented abuse of the GUC system. We probably can't get rid of it at this late date, but we're very unlikely to make any incompatible changes in the behavior.
No, but this is another indication that there is demand for Pavel's schema variables feature that it would be nice to point to instead of saying this usable behavior is unsupported and has no supported alternatives.
