On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:
Dave Cramer wrote: > Well our solution was to use ?? but that does mean we have to do some > extra parsing which in a perfect world wouldn't be necessary.
That's not a good solution as '??' is a perfectly valid operator. ISTR seeing it used somewhere in the wild, but I could be wrong.
It which case you would write (I think, not tested and not part of the test suite that I can see...):
I did find some alternatives discussed a couple of years back, like {postgres qm} and <operator("?")>; the later simply being to allow the operator to be quoted inside "operator()"
