> > + servers. If setting <varname>max_wal_senders</varname> to > + <literal>0</literal> consider also reducing the amount of WAL produced > + by changing <varname>wal_level</varname> to <literal>minimal</literal>. > > I don't think this is great advice. It will encourage people to use > wal_level = minimal even if they have other requirements that weigh > against it. If they feel that their system is producing too much > WAL, I doubt they'll have a hard time finding the wal_level knob. >
Agreed. It isn't good advice. We can remove the suggestion.
Yeah, I wrote that thinking that max_wal_senders being set to 0 implied archive_mode = off, but that isn't the case.
