Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwaE62njLgNgQpo+vn_LVPSPW+ihn--RQHkFu=Yg+TSpfw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug on drop extension dependencies ?  (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sunday, July 13, 2025, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote:
Em sáb., 12 de jul. de 2025 às 16:07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu:
Indeed.  If we put a restriction on this case then we'd just need to
invent a "REALLY CASCADE" option that did the more aggressive thing.

I understand that it's not possible to prevent DROP ... CASCADE from executing. However, the subsequent deletion of constraints, triggers, or functions will affect the behavior of other schemas, so I think it's reasonable to at least explicitly state in the log which objects were deleted due to that command.

Then install an event trigger and log every object that gets dropped at any time.

David J.
 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zhang Mingli
Date:
Subject: Re: [Question] Window Function Results without ORDER BY Clause
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] replace float8 with int in date2isoweek() and date2isoyear()