On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 11:50 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
Primarily in favor of escape hatch:
Jeff, DavidR, Pavel, Andres, Robert ??, Amit ??
To be clear, by "escape hatch" you mean "add a GUC that instructs the PostgreSQL executor to ignore hash_mem when deciding whether to spill the contents of the hash table to disk - IOW to never spill the contents of a hash table to disk"? If so that seems separate from whether to add a hash_mem GUC to provide finer grained control - people may well want both.
Primarily in favor of hash_mem/hash_mem_multiplier:
PeterG, Tom, Alvaro, Tomas, Justin, DavidG, Jonathan Katz
I would prefer DavidJ as an abbreviation - my middle initial can be dropped when referring to me.
