On Thursday, June 20, 2024, Markus Winand <
markus.winand@winand.at> wrote:
> On 21.06.2024, at 06:46, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
> 2 also has the benefit of being standard conforming while 1 does not.
Why do you think so? Do you have any references or is this just based on previous statements in this discussion?
Hearsay.
> 4) If ALREADY PARSED is False, then it is implementation-defined whether the
> following rules are applied:
> a) The General Rules of Subclause 9.36, "Parsing JSON text", are applied with
> JT as JSON TEXT, an implementation-defined <JSON key uniqueness constraint>
> as UNIQUENESS CONSTRAINT, and FO as FORMAT OPTION; let ST be the STATUS and
> let CISJI be the SQL/JSON ITEM returned from the application of those
> General Rules.
> b) If ST is not successful completion, then ST is returned as the STATUS of
> this application of these General Rules, and no further General Rules of
> this Subclause are applied.
But maybe I’m mis-interpreting that snippet and Nikita’s related commentary regarding have chosen between options for this implementation-defined feature.
David j.
