Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZu=CA9FXDqiz99dX8EsprH3QuL6nrJORP4WikhYOAf-A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Design of pg_stat_subscription_workers vs pgstats  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 2:19 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 1:18 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:

> > The view name could be pg_stat_subscription_lrep,
> > pg_stat_logical_replication, or something on those lines.
>
> pg_stat_subscription_stats :)
>

Having *stat* two times in the name sounds slightly odd to me but let
us see what others think. One more option could be
pg_stat_subscription_replication.


Agreed.

pg_stat_subscription_activity

We already have pg_stat_activity (which may be an argument against the suggestion...)

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw: commit remote (sub)transactions in parallel during pre-commit
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing power consumption on idle servers