Re: Probable documentation errors or improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: Probable documentation errors or improvements
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZh3k_CX2-+NcZ=FZss4bX6ASxDFEXJTY6u4wTH+G8+KA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Probable documentation errors or improvements  (Yaroslav <ladayaroslav@yandex.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 12:20 PM Yaroslav <ladayaroslav@yandex.ru> wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not a native speaker, so not sure those are actually
incorrect, and can't offer non-trivial suggestions.

I skimmed about 2/3rds of these and while I agree on the surface that probably 3/4ths of them are improvements they aren't clear enough wins to methodically go through and write up one or more patches.

There are a few areas that seem outdated that could use a good once-over in the sgml sources to clean up.  For those I'd expect that I or someone else may go and write up actual patches.

This run-on presentation is off-putting.  Even if actual patches are not forthcoming I would at least suggest one email per topic with the suggestions broken down into at least bugs (at the top) and non-bugs/improvements.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Sometimes the output to the stdout in Windows disappears
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Gripes about walsender command processing