Re: dumb question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: dumb question
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwZeDWL1xp8oab1rXHKoXpbMOaYbfheRKsOZ=LdjcjRdgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dumb question  (Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com>)
Responses Re: dumb question  (Steve Clark <steve.clark@netwolves.com>)
Re: dumb question  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Re: dumb question  (Steve Clark <steve.clark@netwolves.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Steve Crawford <scrawford@pinpointresearch.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Felipe Santos <felipepts@gmail.com> wrote:
I think sts=0 means ref_id is null

So, what I think he wants to achieve is:

select max(id) from yourtable where sts=0 and id not in (select ref_id from yourtable);

Isn't it?

The OP will need to explain further as we are all guessing. As I mentioned in my earlier (accidental top - curses GMail) post, table structures and the query or queries that don't work would be useful. So would a description of the problem that is being solved since there could be better approaches.


​Maybe we mis-interpreted but as written this is the solution.  My out-loud thinking was a more verbose version of this.​
 

​David J.​

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Crawford
Date:
Subject: Re: dumb question
Next
From: rverghese
Date:
Subject: Partitioned tables do not return affected row counts to client