> > > > I vote for rejecting it. DDL compatibility is less valuable than other > > compatibility. The hypothetical affected application can change its DDL to > > placate PostgreSQL and use that modified DDL for all other databases, too. > > OK. Any other votes?
I haven't been as close to this as others, so perhaps my vote is only 0.5 on this specific case, but that's my feeling on it.
I think we are being consistent as a project by enforcing strictness of input in this situation so I'll toss my +0.5/+1 here as well.
