Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwYt3ENZoYgY2RBh-U4id_=vntT9uJ83PvxPSsPQ0Cc_Jw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command  (David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca>)
Responses Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 2:08 PM David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca> wrote:

I noticed the document psql-ref.sgml has been updated for both `du+` and
`dg+`, but only `du` and `\du+` are covered in regression test. Is that
because `dg+` is treated exactly the same as `du+` from testing point of
view?

Yes.

The reason I am asking this question is that I notice that `pg_monitor`
also has the detailed information, so not sure if more test cases required.

Of course it does.  Why does that bother you?  And what does that have to do with the previous paragraph?

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: possible memory leak in VACUUM ANALYZE
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)