Re: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwYnYK8SfZqxAR-YM2Feu6pQuUjMbTxpFLiDd4gE3ZikGQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-docs
On Tuesday, May 12, 2020, PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> wrote:
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:

Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html
Description:

I think it should be CAST instead of CASE.

Why?  There no “process” needed to perform type conversion using cast.

David J. 

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: PG Doc comments form
Date:
Subject: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/typeconv-union-case.html
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: The suggestion of reducing autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay shouldbe documented