On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo <fjmolinabravo@gmail.com> wrote:
Now i execute the same in pgsql 9.4.5 and all is fine!!!
The EXPLAINs are:
- pgsql 9.5.1:
Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.03..492944.81 rows=276095 width=4) -> Seq Scan on _gc_tb a (cost=0.00..3321.30 rows=120130 width=66) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on _gc_cat b (cost=0.03..4.06 rows=2 width=70) Recheck Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama)) -> Bitmap Index Scan on _gc_cat_arama_gin (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=2 width=0) Index Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama))
- pgsql 9.4.5: Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.03..492944.81 rows=276095 width=4) -> Seq Scan on _gc_tb a (cost=0.00..3321.30 rows=120130 width=66) -> Bitmap Heap Scan on _gc_cat b (cost=0.03..4.06 rows=2 width=70) Recheck Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama)) -> Bitmap Index Scan on _gc_cat_arama_gin (cost=0.00..0.03 rows=2 width=0) Index Cond: ((arama <@ a.arama) AND (a.arama <@ arama))
The above are exactly the same, so if they are indeed from the different versions I do not see an issue. The question to ask here is whether the above are actually from the different Postgres instances?
yes these are differents
It would be nice to see the output of "EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, TIMING, BUFFERS)" so real timings can be observed.
