Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David G. Johnston
Subject Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con
Date
Msg-id CAKFQuwYHHd_UDR7OwhbCkw0H-7=kP9k1otrS187dd_ag-mospQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con  (rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con
List pgsql-general
Tree view
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 6:48 AM, rakeshkumar464 <rakeshkumar464@outlook.com> wrote:
I would prefer using postgresql.conf.  what is the consensus in this forum
regarding command line vs postgresql.conf. 

​I suspect that most people administering a PostgreSQL database would expect that the configuration file would be changed in lieu of passing options via the command line.

Also if conflicting, which one
takes priority.


David J.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] starting PG command line options vs postgresql.con
Next
From: Alexander Farber
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Comparing epoch to timestamp