On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Gauthier, Dave <dave.gauthier@intel.com> wrote:
> v8.3.4 on linux
> After this..
>
> alter table fred alter column wilma set default 'dino';
>
> ...it appeared that a user that had insert,delete,update privs lost them.
>
> I regranded and things went back to normal.
>
> Is it correct for those privs to be dropped in this case? If so, why (just
> curious).
I don't think the behavior you described would be correct. But works
for me on 8.3.18 (see testcase below), and I don't see any bugfixes
like this in the 8.3.x release notes. Are you able to produce a
self-contained test case?
Josh
-- These commands were run as user 'josh'
test=# CREATE TABLE fred (wilma text);
CREATE TABLE
test=# GRANT INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE ON fred TO dummy;
GRANT
test=# \z fred
Access privileges for database "test"
Schema | Name | Type | Access privileges
--------+------+-------+-----------------------------------
public | fred | table | {josh=arwdxt/josh,dummy=awd/josh}
(1 row)
test=# ALTER TABLE fred ALTER COLUMN wilma SET DEFAULT 'dino';
ALTER TABLE
test=# \z fred
Access privileges for database "test"
Schema | Name | Type | Access privileges
--------+------+-------+-----------------------------------
public | fred | table | {josh=arwdxt/josh,dummy=awd/josh}
(1 row)
