On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net> wrote:
> I have a table with a fair bit of TOAST data in it.
> I noticed that \d+ does /not/ include that information (but
> pg_total_relation_size does).
I assume by "\d+" you meant "\dt+" (\d+ doesn't show sizes at all). On
version 9.0 and up, \dt+ uses pg_relation_size() internally, which
actually does include TOAST data as this comment in dbsize.c explains:
* Calculate total on-disk size of a given table,
* including FSM and VM, plus TOAST table if any.
* Indexes other than the TOAST table's index are not included.
The extra space displayed by pg_total_relation_size() is from indexes
on the table.
> Is that intentional? It seems a bit misleading, insofar as "\d+" feels
> like it is meant to be a rough indication of the table size, but if
> 90% of the data is in TOAST then the *real* data stored is much more
> than displayed.
FYI, the implementation was agreed upon here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01268.php
There were some ideas tossed around in that thread about ways to also
include index size as well, which I do think would be nice to have. It
would be a challenge to format that information nicely, particularly
without messing up the tabular output of different types of relations
(e.g. "\dts+").
Josh
