Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Drake
Subject Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Date
Msg-id CAJvJg-Tv=Oz+ThNCMedxyQGEEO0Ak7EKWN4ZWmK04Dj53Q6FWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Howdy,

Well I certainly wasn't trying to make work out of that blog but I am glad to see it was productive.

JD

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:43 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
After digging a bit more I noticed that we'd discussed removing
IS OF in the 2007 thread, but forebore because there wasn't an easy
replacement.  pg_typeof() was added a year later (b8fab2411), so we
could have done this at any point since then.

Pushed.

                        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: James Hilliard
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix compilation on mac with Xcode >= 11.4.
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: error_severity of brin work item