Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGfMigtNmU9m=6sWby4FBdgkG9jHwSyU21RZcPvW=j2k6Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: NOTIFY in Background Worker  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi
> <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I marked this patch as ready for committer.
>
> The patch says:
>
> If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications
> with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>,
> there is currently no way for incoming notifications to be received.
>
> But wouldn't it be more correct to say:
>
> If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications
> with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, the
> worker will log those notifications, but there is no programmatic way
> for the worker to intercept and respond to those notifications.

Yes, the above description is good.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Brain fade in gin_extract_jsonb_path()